Natalie M. Fleming

Why they say you should vote for them

The candidate's own case to voters, summarized from their campaign and public statements.

• Says she runs as an independent who owes both parties' donors nothing and will cast her own votes.[1]
• Says her experience in software, supply chains and cybersecurity prepares her to fix systems problems such as housing costs and immigration processing.[1],[2]
• Says affordable home ownership is her top priority and that families who can afford rent should be able to afford a mortgage.[1]
• Says she would fight mass surveillance by government and corporations and restore Fourth Amendment protections.[1],[3]

Background

• Software developer, Technology industry (including WordPerfect and Novell)[2]
• Independent candidate for U.S. Senate, Idaho · 2020[4]

Education

• Degrees in Information Technology Management and Supply Chain Management; minor in Cybersecurity, Boise State University[1],[2]

Where they stand

• Housing
  Would limit the number of homes any one entity can own to no more than ten, use Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to convert corporate-owned rentals to mortgages, and ban non-resident foreign ownership of homes.[1]
• Elections & Democracy
  Would cut federal grants for camera networks, bar federal agencies from local license-plate data without a warrant, and pass the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act.[1]
• Immigration
  Supports immigration reform that pairs border security with a faster, simpler legal immigration process.[3]
• Energy & Environment
  Would restore the 30 percent federal tax credit for homeowner-owned solar panels and batteries, keep Idaho's dams running, and favors rooftop solar over solar farms on farmland.[1]
• Agriculture
  Supports the PRIME Act, antitrust enforcement in meatpacking and farm supplies, right-to-repair for farm equipment, and simpler farmworker visas for family-scale operations.[1]
• Economy & Jobs
  Supports protecting SNAP food assistance funding.[3]

Voting record

Natalie M. Fleming has not held an office with a recorded voting record. See Background and Where they stand.

In their words